How to Newsjack a Breaking Story: Our Newsjacking Process, Step by Step
Learn how to newsjack a breaking story the way Prism PR does: monitor the news, find the angle, build the list, pitch fast and publish…

Xbox’s first chief operating officer is out three months after the job was created. Helen Chiang, a 21-year Microsoft veteran, is leaving the company, and her executive departure announcement was an internal memo The Verge called “surprisingly short.” Asked why, Xbox told reporters: “We don’t discuss individual personnel matters.” As Kotaku put it, the role was created “to assure long-term stability in an operation that looks like anything but.”
A thin exit statement can be extremely damaging. When a senior executive leaves, the announcement is worth the time it takes to write a more thorough and thoughtful answer, one that addresses the departure and, in the same breath, pivots to the good news. Is someone better suited for the role coming in? Is the role being absorbed by a named leader? Is there a fix, or a new deal, that the next person will run? Put that in the statement.
Xbox’s memo named no successor and no plan, and the gap filled itself within a day. I have spent more than 20 years in corporate America and at top New York PR agencies, including in-house communications at the NBA and NASCAR. Here is what I would tell any CEO, founder or communications team before they announce that an executive is leaving.
Here is how the memo from Xbox CEO Asha Sharma announced it, as reported by The Verge: “Helen Chiang is leaving Microsoft today. I’m grateful for her years of service and wish her well.” The Verge reported that her responsibilities were being split among other Xbox leaders for now, and Sharma noted that “we’ll share more on COO leadership as plans are finalized.”
The outside statement matched it. “We don’t discuss individual personnel matters,” Xbox vice president of communications Kari Perez told The Verge. “We’re grateful for Helen’s years of service and wish her well.”
Now look at what reporters did with it. The Verge’s own story said the short memo, together with her duties going to other leaders, “makes it seem like this wasn’t a resignation.” Windows Central wrote that “people immediately began to speculate that Chiang had been removed over a clash or disagreement of sorts.” By the next day, Eurogamer was reporting that a source familiar with the situation alleged she had been “terminated for policy violations,” a claim Eurogamer said it could not independently verify. Microsoft has not said why she left.
That is how it works. Reporters do not stop asking because you stopped talking. They call someone else.
Timing made this one worse. In July, Sharma’s “Resetting XBOX” memo announced “the most significant restructure in XBOX history,” about 3,200 job cuts over the fiscal year, and, “for the first time,” a chief operating officer “with end-to-end P&L responsibility across content, hardware, platform, and services.” Chiang was the person promoted to fix the problem. When that person leaves after three months with a few lines of memo, the story writes itself: the plan is not working.
A short statement hands the story to somebody else. Reporters need a second paragraph. If you do not give them one, they will write it from anonymous sources, former employees and Reddit threads.
Compare that with how the same company handled a bigger exit eight months earlier. When Phil Spencer retired in February, Microsoft’s announcement explained that he had decided to retire the year before and that “since then we’ve been talking about succession planning.” It named his successor, named a newly promoted chief content officer, and said he would stay on in an advisory role “to support a smooth handoff.” The news was the departure. The story was what came next.
The fix is simple: never announce a departure without announcing what happens next. Put the exit in the first line, then give reporters the better story:
Some departures come with legal limits. If an executive leaves over a policy matter, you cannot say much about the person, and you should not. That is exactly why the forward-looking half matters most. You may not be able to explain why someone left, but you can always explain who is in charge now and what they are going to do.
“As plans are finalized” is not a plan. If the plan is not ready, the announcement probably is not either.
The best time to write an executive departure announcement is before anyone is leaving. Here is what I would do on Monday:
There is one more reason to get the statement right. The coverage never goes away. Every story about a messy exit stays online and shapes what people find about your company for years.
That matters for SEO and AEO: showing up when people search on Google, and when they ask AI tools like ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. Muck Rack analyzed more than 25 million links cited by AI tools in its May 2026 “What Is AI Reading?” report and found that about 84% of citations come from earned media (a group that includes journalism, academic and government sources, and encyclopedic sites like Wikipedia).
In plain terms, news coverage is a big part of what AI tells people about you. If the only stories about your leadership are about who left and why nobody would say, that is the answer the machines repeat.
The fix is a steady run of good stories in real outlets, with backlinks (a clickable link from a news story to your website, which lifts your Google ranking). That is the work we do at Prism. We are an award-winning, full-service PR agency, and we are also a digital PR and linkbuilding firm. Our crisis and reputation work and our earned media for SEO and AEO run on the same idea: earned media is what people, Google and AI all trust.
The fact of the departure, a sincere thank-you, and what happens next: who is taking over or absorbing the role, what that person will do, and any good news the change makes possible. Use the same story in the internal memo and the press statement.
Then say less about the person and more about the plan. You can always name who is in charge now and what they will focus on, and that gives reporters a story other than the exit.
Yes, with something useful. “No comment” or “we don’t discuss personnel matters” alone invites reporters to find the answer elsewhere. Pair whatever you can’t discuss with something you can: the successor, the plan or the next piece of news.
Xbox will name a new chief operating officer eventually. By then, the first draft of this story will already have been written by everyone else. If you have a leadership change coming, write the second paragraph before the first one goes out.
Want help with the statement, or with the stories that come after it? Talk to us.
Keep Reading
Learn how to newsjack a breaking story the way Prism PR does: monitor the news, find the angle, build the list, pitch fast and publish…
Jay-Z picked himself for the Super Bowl halftime show. Prism PR CEO Rick Pendrick on why the backlash was avoidable: announce it and explain it…
Cracker Barrel's CEO left a year after its logo fiasco. Prism PR CEO Rick Pendrick on why a rebrand backlash lasts, and how to test…
Get Started
Tell us what you want to be known for. We will show you how earned media gets you there.